Forward induction equilibrium
نویسنده
چکیده
Forward induction is the notion that players in a game assume, even when confronted with an unexpected event, that their opponents chose rationally in the past and will choose rationally in the future. This paper modifies Govindan and Wilson’s (2009, Econometrica 77(1), 1-28) definition of forward induction and constructs an admissible, invariant forward induction equilibrium concept for general games using normal form perfect equilibrium. Forward induction equilibrium according to this new definition exists for all finite, generic extensive form games with perfect recall. It does not satisfy backward induction. Yet for generic extensive form games the set of forward induction outcomes contains an invariant sequential equilibrium outcome. Forward induction is not equivalent to iterative elimination of strategies dominated at the equilibrium value. In signaling games, a forward induction equilibrium survives most existing equilibrium refinements.
منابع مشابه
Forward Induction and Public Randomization†
We show that if the set of subgame perfect equilibrium payoffs of a stage game is convexified by the introduction of public random variables, then forward induction loses all its power as an argument for refining Nash equilibrium. We establish that our argument does not depend on a convenient choice of off-equilibrium path beliefs. JEL Classification C72
متن کاملForward induction reasoning and correct beliefs
All equilibrium concepts implicitly make a correct beliefs assumption, stating that a player believes that his opponents are correct about his first-order beliefs. In this paper we show that in many dynamic games of interest, this correct beliefs assumption may be incompatible with a very basic form of forward induction reasoning: the first two layers of extensive-form rationalizability (Pearce...
متن کاملEconometrica, Submission #6956, revised ON FORWARD INDUCTION
A player’s pure strategy is called relevant for an outcome of a game in extensive form with perfect recall if there exists a weakly sequential equilibrium with that outcome for which the strategy is an optimal reply at every information set it does not exclude. The outcome satisfies forward induction if it results from a weakly sequential equilibrium in which players’ beliefs assign positive pr...
متن کاملNo . 1955 On Forward Induction Srihari Govindan
We examine Hillas and Kohlberg’s conjecture that invariance to the addition of payoff-redundant strategies implies that a backward induction outcome survives deletion of strategies that are inferior replies to all equilibria with the same outcome. That is, invariance and backward induction imply forward induction. Although it suffices in simple games to interpret backward induction as a subgame...
متن کاملOn Forward Induction
We examine Hillas and Kohlberg’s conjecture that invariance to the addition of payoff-redundant strategies implies that a backward induction outcome survives deletion of strategies that are inferior replies to all equilibria with the same outcome. That is, invariance and backward induction imply forward induction. Although it suffices in simple games to interpret backward induction as a subgame...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 75 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012